dayliyreport

Search

Bonds

Bank of England Eyes UK ILS iSPV for Life and FundedRe Risks

·5 min read
Advertisement

The Bank of England's Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), represented by Director Vicky White, is advocating for the utilization of the UK's Insurance-Linked Securities (ILS) and Insurance Special Purpose Vehicle (iSPV) structure. This strategic move aims to bring patient, long-term capital onshore to bolster the life and pensions sector, an area where UK life insurers and pension schemes frequently seek offshore reinsurance for their risks, a practice known as FundedRe.

For a considerable period, the Bank of England has scrutinized the FundedRe trend and offshore pension reinsurance, viewing them as potential areas requiring enhanced oversight. A primary concern has been the transfer of assets offshore while the underlying risks remain within the domestic market, particularly in funded arrangements perceived to pose solvency risks to UK companies. However, this marks a new direction as the Bank of England proposes an onshore mechanism to attract long-term alternative capital closer to the sources of UK life and pension risks. White emphasized that this presents a unique opportunity to align the objectives of policyholder protection with the desire for cheaper and more patient capital, fostering growth within the UK market. The PRA intends to engage with the industry to explore these alternative capital options and identify any regulatory impediments hindering capital inflow, while upholding its commitment to safety, soundness, and policyholder protection.

The discussion highlights the potential application of the iSPV framework, traditionally used for catastrophe bonds and collateralized reinsurance, to the life insurance sector. White elaborated that iSPVs offer a legal and regulatory structure enabling insurers to access external investor capital, providing exposure to specific risk segments without full equity ownership. While acknowledging historical reservations regarding iSPVs for annuity-type business due to finite capital concerns, the PRA, informed by industry feedback, plans to assess how the iSPV framework can be made more accessible for UK life insurers. This aligns with HM Treasury's broader consultation on the Risk Transformation Regulations, indicating a concerted effort to reform the UK iSPV regulatory regime. The overarching goal is to explore whether iSPV or ILS-style structures can effectively introduce alternative capital to manage life risks and reinsurance within the UK, recognizing that such innovation, while offering flexibility and patient capital, may also introduce new trade-offs related to funding periods or risk transfer limitations.

This proactive stance by the regulator, in considering how an established and evolving ILS regulatory framework can address other vital sectors, signals a forward-thinking approach. It aligns with the UK's broader agenda to encourage more domestic financial activity and demonstrates a willingness to explore efficient capital market funding structures. While questions remain regarding the UK's competitiveness compared to offshore jurisdictions and the willingness of large alternative capital providers to shift operations, this exploration is a commendable step towards strengthening the UK's re/insurance and pensions landscape, ultimately benefiting the nation's financial stability and growth.

Related Articles